|
|
Question : Problem: What is the best practice setup for 6 servers in a rack with one Smart UPS?
|
|
I have a rack with 6 Dell servers (PE 2850 and different models) and one APC Smart-UPS 3000. The rack has 1 power strip in the left side and it is plugged into the UPS at the bottom. Each server has redundant power and my question is....
Should I have both power cords for each server plugged directly into the rack power strip (that goes to the UPS)?
Or should I have one power cord going to a constant power (like one going into the wall)?
Do these servers run power active/passive or are they load balanced? If models matter let me know I can post them all up.
I really would like to know what the best practice is for a small setup like this. THANKS GUYS!!!!!!
|
Answer : Problem: What is the best practice setup for 6 servers in a rack with one Smart UPS?
|
|
This all depends on the level of power redundancy you are looking for. First, I would check for the power requirements and make sure that everything seems to work out - you don't want to overload the PDU (Power Distribution Unit - the power strip) or the UPS or the circuit that this is all running on. This may help a little with power requirements and lots of information like heat:
http://www.dell.com/html/us/products/rack_advisor/index.html?~lt=popup
Beyond that, each system is going to be different as far as active/passive goes. Most Dell systems have only one redundant power supply. If you have a total of three power supplies, for instance, two will be required and the third is the failover. They are an N+1 configuration. For all but the last one, they will be balanced but the redundant one is active/passive. A 2850 has a total of two power supplies so only one will be drawing any significant power and the other is passive unless/until a failover occurs. A 4600, however, is in a 3+1 configuration. The system will hold 4 power supplies. Three are required and will be drawing power and the last one is passive.
Back to the suggested setup. Like I said, it depends on the level of redundancy you need. The most robust I have seen worked like this: Circuit 1 --> UPS 1 --> PDU 1 --> Power Supply 1 Circuit 2 --> UPS 2 --> PDU 2 --> Power Supply 2
This was set up for every system. Each system occupied a one slot on each PDU and therefore had power redundancy at every level of the power chain. Clearly, this is not a requirement. Let's look at the situations you have outlined: Case 1 Circuit 1 --> UPS 1 --> PDU 1 --> Power Supply 1 Circuit 1 --> UPS 1 --> PDU 1 --> Power Supply 2 In this case, your only redundancy is at the power supply level. The circuit, UPS and PDU become a single point of failure. Case 2 Circuit 1 --> UPS 1 --> PDU 1 --> Power Supply 1 Circuit 1 --> Power Supply 2 In this case, you have eliminated the UPS and the PDU as a single point of failure but the circuit supplying the servers and the UPS is still a single point of failure. Also, you have reduced the level of protection from power events such as surges, sudden losses or storm damage.
I can't say what is "best" for you but these are some of the pros/cons of the cases you have asked about. Also, we really don't know all the equipment/budget at your disposal to accomplish this.
|
|
|
|