|
|
Question : Problem: Enough texture memory to match 1680x1050 TFT display?
|
|
Hi all,
Please could some kind person advise me on a new purchase..
WHICH TFT MONITOR SHOULD I GET FOR AROUND 200 POUNDS TO MATCH MY DUAL 7600GT CARDS (256MB)??
Currently I have a 17" high quality Dell TFT monitor, but it only has a 9pin input and my new graphics cards have only DVI so I want to upgrade.
My main priorities are:
1. Low cost (about 200 pounds or maybe a max of 235 pounds).
2. DVI output.
3. Larger than 17" size because I want to watch DVD's on it too.
4. Higher than usual update speed because I often play games like Stalker & Oblivion.
5. A reliable manufacturer because this monitor needs to last several years.
I'm not really concerned about viewing angle as I usually sit exactly in front of the monitor. However I'm thinking a widescreen monitor would be good, but I'm concerned that some of my older games wouldn't support such a strange aspect ratio. Could someone confirm that HalfLife 1, Diablo 2 and Warcraft 3 would work on a widescreen monitor?
My other main concern is that my graphics cards wouldn't have sufficient RAM to cope with large texture size games at such a high resolution (1680x1050).. Both my MSI 7600GT graphics cards have only 256MB each and they run in SLi configuration with 2GB high speed main RAM on an Asus P5NE-Sli mboard.
I had a look at a few monitors and something like one of these seemed good:
Samsung SM226BW 22" TFT Monitor 1680x1050, 2ms, 1000:1 contrast, 300cdm2 (widescreen) 235
pounds.
Iiyama E2200WS 22"- 5ms - 1000:1, 300cdm2 (widescreen). 197 pounds. Samsung SM223BW 21.6" 5ms TFT 1000:1, 300cdm2 (widescreen). 211 pounds.
I'm also a bit confused by two of the attributes describing these monitors - some of them seem to use TN technology and some use A-si technology. Which one should I be going for? Also is it better to have a higher cd/m2 number or a lower one? Thanks for any comments received! All much appreciated!
-Seth
|
Answer : Problem: Enough texture memory to match 1680x1050 TFT display?
|
|
To be honest, I think your price range (200 pounds/$400) allows for really quite top of the line monitors. I haven't seen many monitors higher than that.
About refresh rates, 10/ms vs 2/ms is almost completely undetectable by your eye, you might want to consider not going for the absolute fastest unless your sure it will be significant.
|
|
|
|